propulsion: (Default)
tony stark. ([personal profile] propulsion) wrote in [community profile] dear_mun2013-04-22 06:42 pm

help.

Not bad. Kind of pithy. One word usernames are on trend right now, so I appreciate it, but I'm just not sure it's, you know, me enough. You may want to talk to my marketing department, they'll tell you -- one syllable, hard consonants. It's all about image.

Speaking of image, I kind of only have fifteen as a max, seven as of now. That's not going to work for me. I understand you're, well, "broke", but have you considered having money?

Little thing, also, quick question -- are we going to save the world at any point? Not saying I have a monopoly on that, but-- well, no, I do. Literal hero monopoly.

You really haven't thought this through. Firing you.

Edit: See? That wasn't so hard. [ ooc ; lmdjsjd thank you. ]
efficacy: (✓ tears of joy)

[personal profile] efficacy 2013-04-22 11:45 am (UTC)(link)
Just pointing out that little incongruity in your statement, that's all. But sure, we can go with irresponsible, too.
efficacy: (✓ 039)

[personal profile] efficacy 2013-04-22 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, is that what it was? Right. [ Pfft. ] So, responsible. I'll give you the world saving part, at least.
efficacy: (✓ 003)

[personal profile] efficacy 2013-04-22 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed, especially when you did it without prompting - unless JARVIS reminded you. Getting the images is a little less surprising.

It's preferable to 12percent, which was apparently taken at the time. Much to my continued relief.
efficacy: (✓ 017)

[personal profile] efficacy 2013-04-23 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I've been well acquainted with that habit of yours by now. I'm glad they didn't go with that one. Just... no. There's enough going on around you as is without adding a username like that into the mix.