gyldensterne (
gyldensterne) wrote in
dear_mun2012-12-22 12:05 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Canon is Technically 'Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead', but Shakespeare is close enough.
Yes but can you sustain it? That is really the question - and the answer to which all depends upon.
For a certain definition of 'all'. And a certain definition of 'depends', too, I should imagine.
It would be easier to manage with some backup, that's all I'm saying. I won't even much complain that you seem a bit... adrift, if you catch my meaning, as to where you even intend to place me.
So long as it's not on any boats!
For a certain definition of 'all'. And a certain definition of 'depends', too, I should imagine.
It would be easier to manage with some backup, that's all I'm saying. I won't even much complain that you seem a bit... adrift, if you catch my meaning, as to where you even intend to place me.
So long as it's not on any boats!
no subject
Unless you mean she hasn't been on boats, in which case I can hardly blame her. I've begun to develop a certain aversion myself...
no subject
no subject
Of course if we are in fact on a boat, or a ship I suppose or even a dinghy, then those sorts of decisions are out of our hands entirely and she's only as happy as it's possible to allow for, in such confines of forward momentum.
But taking the boat out of the equation, and then we get... then we get...
we get a negative boat, that's what we get.
no subject
[Muse is nonplussed. Mun is delighted :)]