Conan Edogawa (Shinichi Kudo) (
modernholmes) wrote in
dear_mun2012-07-13 10:21 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
The main reason this Conan has never made friends with a Sherlock
I am not a canon purist, and I will thank you to stop making jokes about it.
It is simple. None of these people who bear the name Sherlock can possibly compare to the brilliance of the original Holmes. I don't see what is so hard to understand about that.
It is simple. None of these people who bear the name Sherlock can possibly compare to the brilliance of the original Holmes. I don't see what is so hard to understand about that.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do believe that thinking no adaptation can hold a candle to the original is the textbook definition of a canon purist.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[What now? :3]
no subject
Explain.
no subject
no subject
the player aplogizes for the character's tendency to ramble
Opinions are distinct from this in that they are active thoughts and cognition that are guided by our perceptions. If, for example, a shade of purple or green looks disgusting to me in my orange-tinted world, it may not have anything to do with the color itself but rather how I am able to visualizing it. It is a divergent opinion based on subjective perception. Would I be wrong to not liking those shades of purple or green?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
....The mun seems to think it would be funny, though.
no subject
no subject
no subject