Rung (
schaden_freud) wrote in
dear_mun2012-05-28 10:34 am
Entry tags:
Under new Mun-agement
So. Uh. Mun.
I must take this moment to register a protest about this treatment, on two grounds.
First, this whole 'pup' designation. This implies possession and ownership. No one owns another person. I am pretty sure Ultra Magnus would have very strong things to say about that concept and the Autobot Code, very strongly worded. . Very precisely worded, too.
Second, erm...I've seen what you do to your other 'pup's.
....then again, I doubt it is much worse than canon.
[Seriously? Sparkeater-bait? And next month's issue doesn't look very Rung-friendly, either. If he may say.]
I must take this moment to register a protest about this treatment, on two grounds.
First, this whole 'pup' designation. This implies possession and ownership. No one owns another person. I am pretty sure Ultra Magnus would have very strong things to say about that concept and the Autobot Code, very strongly worded. . Very precisely worded, too.
Second, erm...I've seen what you do to your other 'pup's.
....then again, I doubt it is much worse than canon.
[Seriously? Sparkeater-bait? And next month's issue doesn't look very Rung-friendly, either. If he may say.]

no subject
It curls around that ankle and pulls Rung out from under the desk.]