factualreality: (Default)
Yamazaki Takashi ([personal profile] factualreality) wrote in [community profile] dear_mun2017-12-03 09:21 pm
Entry tags:

Hey, mun, did you know...?

The word 'mun' actually originated from the expression 'mun's the word'!

You see, the art of roleplaying is one that dates back far before the invention of written language, and was originally done by sitting across from one another in a secluded area.  Sometimes there were spectators, but often, it was a private encounter between two individuals.  A challenge, really, to see how easily one could respond to the other.  The idea was to collaborate in terms of creating a story, partially involving spontaneous improvisation but occasionally making special nonverbal signals to one another indicating where they intended for the story to go next.  Over time, this came to be the beginnings of what is known today as 'sign language'.

Now, if you had a mun who was experienced enough and knew what they were doing--and, more importantly, were willing to work with their partner--then the words produced a very entertaining tale.  Back and forth.  Because while the sign language was special in and of itself, it was the words which carried the most weight, because those words were the story itself.  

Thus, mun's the word!

[He finished with a flourish, looking quite proud of himself.  And confident in his tale.]
god_of_hellfire: (This seems like a bad plan)

[personal profile] god_of_hellfire 2017-12-05 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
[John isn't even sure what he just heard, but he's pretty sure that's wrong.]

Are you serious?

[personal profile] colorful_distractions 2017-12-06 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
You know there's multiple sign languages, right? 'The sign language' implies a singular and even if you're using the definition solely to apply to pre-written languages, there's a lot out there.

[But it's said with no malice. More than anything, she's curious how deep this well of knowledge goes, and it's endearing, seeing how enthusiastic he is.]

[personal profile] colorful_distractions 2017-12-06 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
But how can you be sure it's the original given we don't have records? For all you know that 'original' was a spin off of a dialect of the true original sign language and we simply don't know it. Especially taking human migration into account, the idea a singular source language for sign language exists is a little absurd, when you remember oral traditions in Africa and Aboriginal Australia are both equally old.

[personal profile] colorful_distractions 2017-12-06 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Ooo, someone able to admit when they made an omission or mistake. You're a rarity, aren't you? [She grins, genuine and dorky. People who can't concede a point in an argument are the worst, at least in her opinion, so this sent her opinion of him upwards immediately.]

So I suppose the next question is which continent you believe sign language originated from first. Certainly we've got the most evidence from North America, but only because white people came into contact with them and wrote it down. It seems unlikely Africa and Australia were inhabited for so many thousands of years beforehand without developing one of their own, if not many.

[personal profile] colorful_distractions 2017-12-08 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
But in regards to some topics, there's evidence supporting multiple options. We don't know for sure what continent sign languages first originated on, so there's an argument to be made for whichever you personally put more faith in. So you're within your rights to pick and support a side, scientifically and factually speaking.