dear_mun | (no subject)

Entry tags:

(no subject)

Congratulations. You aren't as overcommitted to being an annoyance as some mechanisms I know, but you're certainly trying to put yourself in the running. I should count myself lucky you didn't give me some sort of ridiculous name.

So what sort of half-cocked scheme is behind this move?

…You don't have a plan at all, do you.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

It often doesn't mean well for you if your mun does have a plan.

Consider yourself lucky.

. . . Approximate percentage of mundanes with plans for their muses is about 69% from my observations.

Edited 2013-05-03 03:45 (UTC)

At least if there was a plan here, I could delude myself into thinking I'd picked up a sensible mun. But I suppose you have a point; a lack of forethought means no premeditated ill intent on my person.

I have yet to come across a mun who was in any way sensible or kind.

[There's just something about you that reminds her of someone. Well actually it's not that hard to figure out.]

Actually, a lack of forethought could mean that your mun is open to ideas on how to use you. Undoubtedly they'll have an idea before long.

[Ha optimism, what's that.]

That's a less than inspiring ratio. How large is the test group?

…Use me.

[No. No way. He's enough of a tool as it is.]

Yes.

That is our entire purpose here.

[Red Alert isn't going to be pulling any punches with this.]

Test Group is mundane and her surrounding associates. Perhaps you have different results.

Well, no, I've hardly had time to test anything. And it isn't as though I want to associate with my mundane and/or acquaintances. Seems more Nightbeat's type if you ask me.

Sounds just like the Senate.

… [Wait, he has no idea who she is or where her sympathies lie. What is wrong with him?]

…Who are… pleasant and hard-working souls.

[Congrats, that would have made her laugh if she were the laughing type.]

The Senate is similar to the Autobot High Council I assume?

. . . I am shocked.

[No he's not.]

The probability of you achieving this goal is considerably low. If you are favourable to the mundane.

Edited 2013-05-04 08:08 (UTC)

[If he had to derive solely by context of the titles…]

I suppose one could say that.

I highly doubt I'm favourable. Something about a lack of icon material.

[How was he picked up by such a superficial person?]

The mundane finds it interesting that we are so similar in appearance and lack of icon material.

Similar? Don't be ridiculous we look nothing–

[Odd, he hadn't noticed.]

…Oh.

There are structural similarities.

[Really Quark, get with the program.]

You have only recently noticed.

I'm a bit preoccupied.

Preoccupied with emotional responses to the situation. Perhaps removal would allow for a more adequate running time.

[No Perceptor don't make him into you.]

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only